84. Should we ban social media for kids? Mentioning Jon Haidt, Seymour Skinner, Marc Andreessen...

Jon Haidt's main points:

- No smartphones before high school. Parents should delay children’s entry into round-the-clock internet access by giving only basic phones (phones with limited apps and no internet browser) before ninth grade (roughly age 14).

- No social media before 16. Let kids get through the most vulnerable period of brain development before connecting them to a firehose of social comparison and algorithmically chosen influencers.

- Phone-free schools. In all schools from elementary through high school, students should store their phones, smartwatches, and any other personal devices that can send or receive texts in phone lockers or locked pouches during the school day. That is the only way to free up their attention for each other and for their teachers.

- Far more unsupervised play and childhood independence. That’s the way children naturally develop social skills, overcome anxiety, and become self-governing young adults.

Arguments for and Against Banning Social Media Until 16:

Arguments For Banning Social Media for 16-Year-Olds

Mental Health Issues: Social media can cause anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem due to constant comparison and social pressure.

Cyberbullying: Teenagers are vulnerable to online bullying and harassment, leading to severe emotional distress.

Privacy Concerns: Teens might not understand privacy settings, risking exposure to personal information and online predators.

Addiction and Distraction: Excessive use can lead to addiction, reducing time for studies, physical activities, and face-to-face interactions.

Sleep Disruption: Social media use before bed can disrupt sleep patterns and lead to poor-quality sleep.