Learning Bayesian Statistics

← Learning Bayesian Statistics31 Aug · 1 h 44 min

#164 Bayesian Workflow, with Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari & Richard McElreath

#164 Bayesian Workflow, with Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari & Richard McElreath31 Aug1 h 44 min

<p><b>Support &amp; Resources</b><br />→ Support the show on <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.patreon.com/c/learnbayesstats" target="_blank">Patreon</a><br />→ <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://topmate.io/alex_andorra/1011122" target="_blank">Bayesian Modeling Course</a> (first 2 lessons free)<br /><br />Our theme music is « Good Bayesian », by Baba Brinkman (feat MC Lars and Mega Ran). Check out his<a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://bababrinkman.com/" target="_blank"> awesome work</a></p><p></p><p><b>Takeaways</b>:<br /><b>Q: What is the "Bayesian Workflow" book about, and who is it for?</b><br /></p><p>A: It covers what the three authors know that isn't already in Bayesian Data Analysis (BDA3) or Statistical Rethinking, organized around case studies that walk through full analyses end to end rather than just giving a recommendation. It's not an introduction to Bayesian inference -- it assumes you already know the basics -- but a guide to making theoretically informed, professional decisions at the many branching points a real analysis involves that source books rarely acknowledge.<br /><br /><b>Q: What's a concrete way to report Bayesian results without just handing over a posterior distribution?</b><br /></p><p>A<b>:</b> Report a few named scenarios from the distribution, such as pessimistic, median, and optimistic. This is easier to discuss than a full posterior and helps shift the conversation toward what would move outcomes from the median toward the optimistic case.</p><p></p><p><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://learnbayesstats.com/episode/bayesian-workflow-reverse-bayes-hierarchical-pooling-gelman-vehtari-mcelreath" target="_blank"><b>Full takeaways</b></a></p><p><br /><b>Chapters</b>:<br />00:18:22 What is the elevator pitch for the Bayesian Workflow book?<br />00:20:12 Where does workflow sit between statistical theory and case studies?<br />00:27:21 Why express your scientific background in a generative model?<br />00:36:43 How is a Bayesian workflow different from a pipeline?<br />00:39:03 What is reverse Bayes, and how does it help with prior sensitivity?<br />00:43:53 How do Bayesians reinterpret non-Bayesian methods?<br />00:45:02 How is the Bayesian Workflow book structured?<br />00:48:49 How do you model bat mortality at wind farms from zero-inflated carcass counts?<br />00:52:24 When does a hierarchical model stop being an innocuous assumption?<br />00:58:17 Can multilevel regression and poststratification pool detection across sites?<br />00:59:32 Why start with a big generative simulation before the statistical model?<br />01:02:05 What is the "secret weapon" of comparing shrinkage to fixed-effects estimates?<br />01:11:02 How do you detect which assumptions are actually driving your inference?<br />01:15:24 How do you get regulated industries to accept a posterior instead of a score?<br />01:22:04 Should statisticians soften uncertainty for decision makers?<br />01:23:11 Why report three scenarios instead of a single number?<br />01:27:51 How do you handle a leaky instrument in causal inference?<br />01:29:16 What is a principal stratification model?<br />01:34:47 What are the three authors working on next?<br /></p><p>Thank you to my <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://learnbayesstats.com/#patrons" target="_blank">Patrons </a>for making this episode possible!</p><p><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://learnbayesstats.com/episode/bayesian-workflow-reverse-bayes-hierarchical-pooling-gelman-vehtari-mcelreath" target="_blank"><b>Full show notes</b></a></p>