Bayesian Statistics vs. Epistemology

<p>Today's clip is from episode 160, featuring Vaden Masrani. In this conversation, Vaden explores the tension between Bayesian statistics and Bayesian epistemology, and why he sees them as fundamentally different.<br /><br />He explains why Bayesian epistemology can run into problems when trying to explain where hypotheses themselves come from, and argues that an emphasis on finding supporting evidence can encourage confirmation bias rather than genuine scientific inquiry. He also discusses Hempel's paradox, Popper's idea of falsification, and why these philosophical problems don't necessarily undermine Bayesian statistics itself.<br /><br />Full discussion <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://learnbayesstats.com/episode/160-bayesian-statistics-vs-epistemology-with-vaden-masrani" target="_blank">here</a></p><p></p><p>Support &amp; Resources<br />→ Support the show on <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.patreon.com/c/learnbayesstats" target="_blank">Patreon</a><br />→ <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://topmate.io/alex_andorra/1011122" target="_blank">Bayesian Modeling Course</a> (first 2 lessons free): <br />Our theme music is « Good Bayesian », by Baba Brinkman (feat MC Lars and Mega Ran). Check out his awesome <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://bababrinkman.com/" target="_blank">work!</a></p>