Post Debate Analysis on "Is Selling Licenses to Bible Translations a Sin?"

<p>This was the post-debate analysis and first Q&amp;A session at #doreancon 2025 on &quot;The Stewardship of Scripture&quot; at Silicon Valley Reformed Baptist Church in Sunnyvale, CA. The discussion included Conley Owens, Michael Coughlin, and Andrew Case.<a href="https://copy.church/statement/">SIGN THE STATEMENT on the stewardship of Scripture⁠⁠</a> </p><p><strong>Q&amp;A SECTIONS</strong></p><p>00:00 Post Debate Discussion</p><p>7:56 What are some of the earliest examples in history that mentions scripture and licenses?</p><p>14:12 When does something (e.g.) not become inspired and salable?</p><p>19:09 What are some bible verses related to 2 Corinthians 2:17 regarding peddling the word of God</p><p>23:30 Should we be giving secular knowledge freely?</p><p>24:30 What would cross the line while running a business as a Christian with ministerial aspects</p><p>30:04 Does the dorean principle go beyond Christian ministry with regards to copyright and intellectual property?</p><p>34:33 - Are things like Holman&#39;s connecting scripture be considered copyrightable?</p><p>40:18 - How can translation work with the dorean principle in mind? </p><p>48:15 How can you persuade people about the dorean principle? </p><p>55:56 - Comment on giving generously</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://sellingjesus.org/">⁠⁠<strong>sellingjesus.org</strong>⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠</a><strong> | </strong><a href="https://thedoreanprinciple.org/">⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠<strong>thedoreanprinciple.org</strong>⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠</a><strong> | </strong><a href="https://copy.church/">⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠<strong>copy.church</strong></a></p>