Deconstructor of Fun

← Deconstructor of Fun5. Okt. · 1 Std. 04 Min.

351. Why Great Hires Fail at Startups | Garry Hill, Makers Fund

351. Why Great Hires Fail at Startups | Garry Hill, Makers Fund5. Okt.1 Std. 04 Min.

<p>Most startup hiring mistakes come down to two things: hiring too fast and hiring too narrow. Garry Hill, head of talent at Makers Fund, sees both across a portfolio of 130+ companies. Before Makers Fund, he recruited at SpaceX, Amazon, Blizzard, PlayStation and Reddit.</p><p>We start with the hires who looked perfect on paper and still failed, from pedigreed engineers who burned out at Blizzard to SpaceX's weekend interviews, and how those company cultures really compared. Then we get practical about hiring for game studios and startups discussing referral, interview processes, culture, and how to tell what a big-tech candidate is a fit or not for a startup.</p><p>Garry also explains why senior talent should consider fractional roles, how talent needs change from seed to Series A to Series C, what good onboarding looks like, and the &quot;truth serum&quot; question he uses when interviewing co-founders.</p><p>A vital listen to anyone hiring or getting hired in startups-</p><p><b>chapters:</b></p><p>00:00 Blizzard, SpaceX, Amazon: the hires who looked great and failed<br>12:05 What a head of talent does at Makers Fund<br>14:59 Too fast, too narrow: common founder hiring mistakes<br>19:56 Culture add, not culture fit<br>24:53 Vetting big-tech hires: what did you actually do?<br>31:09 Startup life and going fractional<br>35:03 Seed, Series A, Series C: how talent needs change<br>44:36 Testing co-founders and the truth serum question<br>52:26 Gaming founders vs. tech founders<br>1:00:18 The tell that a co-founder will actually build</p>