AI and legal professional privilege in Australia and the US (Part 1)

<p><a href="https://hallandwilcox.com.au/our-people/lauren-separovich/" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">Lauren Separovich</a> and <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ian-clarke-fisher-06844869/" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">Ian Clarke-Fisher</a> discuss how US courts are responding to artificial intelligence and what Australian lawyers can learn from these developments. They explore the landmark <em>United States v Heppner</em> decision, whether AI should be treated as a third party and the implications for confidentiality and legal professional privilege that flow from this catalyst decision. </p>