The Three Financial Storms on the Horizon

Yes, physical gold is a safe haven, but gold also attracts a lot of speculative capital, particularly the paper markets. Gold futures are among the most traded futures in the world, and there is nothing physical about them. So when there is a panic, gold tends to sell off along with everything else as liquidity dries up and everyone rushes to cash.

The US dollar is actually the safe haven, except that it isn’t, because you are bleeding 7 or 8% of value every year to money supply growth.

I am getting so many messages at the moment asking me what to do “when the collapse comes”, as though the collapse of fiat is a foregone conclusion. I don’t think it is. I think continued depreciation is more likely. Fiat could collapse, of course, but we are in a probabilities game and I’d give it perhaps a 25% probability, while continued depreciation I’d put at well over 50% likelihood.

At present we have three financial storms on the horizon. Whether they actually reach us or not remains to be seen, but we should be aware of them nonetheless, so that we can be prepared if they do eventually close in.

Nasty stock market correction ahead?

They are, first, the fact that US markets are so leveraged to AI. You don’t even need the AI bubble to pop, you just need it to deflate a little bit, and it takes the S&P500 down with it.

It’s not like I, and many others besides, haven’t mentioned this before, but it bears mentioning again: the Magnificent Seven, which are highly AI oriented, currently account for about a third of the combined market capitalisation of the S&P’s 500 companies. Ten years ago the equivalent concentration was around 15%, and that seemed like a lot.

From an asset allocation perspective - particularly with so much passive investing - this is dangerous, to put it mildly. Concentration is fine when markets are going up. If you’re concentrated in the right sector you make a lot of money. But when things unravel you get your backside handed to you on a plate. Diversification spreads risk. The S&P500 “should” be diversified. It isn’t. Passive investing is supposed to be diversified. It isn’t.

But this has been the case for a long time. It hasn’t mattered. It doesn’t matter until it does.

Then there is the fact that every mid-term election years have a tendency to deliver autumn drawdowns. According to some sources, every year.

If we get a significant drawdown in the S&P500, the safehaven that is gold will sell off too.

Wobbly bonds