Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum

← Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum26. Aug. · 40 Min.

What the Jury Never Heard in the Karmelo Anthony Trial | Reagan Charleston Thomas

What the Jury Never Heard in the Karmelo Anthony Trial | Reagan Charleston Thomas26. Aug.40 Min.

Karmelo Anthony was convicted of murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during an altercation at a high school track meet and was sentenced to 35 years in prison. Anthony’s defense team sought a new trial, and hearings this week revealed that prosecutors and the defense had agreed to keep certain evidence from the original jury.

In this episode of Zone 7, Sheryl McCollum is joined by civil litigator Reagan Charleston Thomas to discuss what that newly disclosed information could mean for the case. They look at the agreement between prosecutors and the defense that kept information about both teenagers out of the original trial and the strategy behind that decision. Sheryl and Reagan also discuss the Nolan Wells case and the dispute over access to his phone before reacting to Judge Michael Chitty’s ruling denying Karmelo Anthony’s motion for a new trial.

Highlights:

(0:00) Sheryl recaps the Karmelo Anthony case and introduces civil litigator Reagan Charleston Thomas

(3:00) Reagan discusses her work in digital harm litigation and why teenagers’ phones can become critical sources of evidence

(4:15) How lawyers build a case by telling a story within the framework of the law

(5:30) The agreement that kept damaging information about both Karmelo Anthony and Austin Metcalf out of the original trial

(6:45) When a school could potentially face civil liability for known threats, bullying, or violent behavior

(8:00) Karmelo’s alleged text about shooting up the school and questions about why prosecutors chose not to introduce it

(12:00) A reported statement about stabbing someone and the evidence involving Austin’s prior graffiti arrest

(16:00) The role racial tension and concerns for both families' safety played in shaping trial strategy

(18:45) Reagan explains why the alleged knife-related text messages changed the way she viewed the evidence and self-defense claim