Counter-Errorism in Diving: Applying Human Factors to Diving

← Counter-Errorism in Diving: Applying Human Factors to Diving12 Aug · 13 min

SH303: The Structure of This Diving Tragedy Was Not Abnormal. The Scale Was.

SH303: The Structure of This Diving Tragedy Was Not Abnormal. The Scale Was.12 Aug13 min

This episode explores why diving accidents are so often explained by individual mistakes instead of the wider conditions that made those mistakes possible. Using the case of a fatal medication error in healthcare alongside the recent Maldives cave diving tragedy, it examines how hindsight, blame, and our natural tendency to focus on people rather than systems can prevent meaningful learning. The discussion highlights how unsafe practices can become normal when they repeatedly appear to work, and why serious accidents often reveal long-standing weaknesses that existed long before the final event. Rather than asking "Who is at fault?", the episode argues that the better question is "What conditions made these decisions seem reasonable at the time?"—because understanding those conditions offers the best chance of preventing similar tragedies in the future.

Original blog: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/the-structure-is-normal-the-scale-is-not

Links: Martin Anderson’s write-up: https://humanfactors101.com/2022/05/08/is-human-error-a-crime/

Andrzej Gornicki’s Eight Question Review: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/eight-questions-about-maldives-accident

Gareth’s blog about accountability: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/we-want-accountability

Assumptions and worn paths: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/why-rules-get-broken

Consensus is because people don’t want to disagree: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/beyond-the-floor

Conditions produce outcomes: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/what-conditions

Useful illegality in action: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/why-rules-get-broken

Tags: THD-English| THD-Learning, Incidents & Just Culture