
← Counter-Errorism in Diving: Applying Human Factors to Diving12 Aug · 13 min
SH303: The Structure of This Diving Tragedy Was Not Abnormal. The Scale Was.
This episode explores why diving accidents are so often explained by individual mistakes instead of the wider conditions that made those mistakes possible. Using the case of a fatal medication error in healthcare alongside the recent Maldives cave diving tragedy, it examines how hindsight, blame, and our natural tendency to focus on people rather than systems can prevent meaningful learning. The discussion highlights how unsafe practices can become normal when they repeatedly appear to work, and why serious accidents often reveal long-standing weaknesses that existed long before the final event. Rather than asking "Who is at fault?", the episode argues that the better question is "What conditions made these decisions seem reasonable at the time?"—because understanding those conditions offers the best chance of preventing similar tragedies in the future.
Original blog: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/the-structure-is-normal-the-scale-is-not
Links: Martin Anderson’s write-up: https://humanfactors101.com/2022/05/08/is-human-error-a-crime/
Andrzej Gornicki’s Eight Question Review: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/eight-questions-about-maldives-accident
Gareth’s blog about accountability: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/we-want-accountability
Assumptions and worn paths: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/why-rules-get-broken
Consensus is because people don’t want to disagree: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/beyond-the-floor
Conditions produce outcomes: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/what-conditions
Useful illegality in action: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/why-rules-get-broken
Tags: THD-English| THD-Learning, Incidents & Just Culture