Lawyer Unleashed

← Lawyer Unleashed7 Jul · 22 min

"The SQE Is a Disaster" - Inside Law's Most Hated Exam - James Richardson

"The SQE Is a Disaster" - Inside Law's Most Hated Exam - James Richardson7 Jul22 min

<p>The SQE was supposed to make legal education cheaper, fairer and more accessible.</p><p><br /></p><p>Instead, pass rates are falling (in July last year 59% of students failed SQE1), costs are rising, and thousands of aspiring solicitors are being sold a dream that may never lead to a legal career.</p><p><br /></p><p>James Richardson, qualified at a major international firm, now Head of Legal at Cuvva, and co-founder of Law Student Academy, explains how the SQE has completely failed on its promises and why the profession needs to confront some uncomfortable truths.</p><p><br /></p><p>James reveals:</p><p><br /></p><p>▪ How up to three out of five students now fail the SQE</p><p>▪ Why the exam bears little resemblance to real legal practice</p><p>▪ The false hope being sold to aspiring solicitors</p><p>▪ Why the SQE hasn't improved diversity in law</p><p>▪ How the SRA ignored warnings from the profession</p><p>▪ Why Kaplan's role (as the sole exclusive provider of the exams) raises serious questions</p><p>▪ What needs to change to fix legal education</p><p><br /></p><p>(00:00) – Why the SQE is one of the hardest exams in law</p><p>(00:58) – Meet James Richardson</p><p>(01:36) – Why James founded Law Student Academy</p><p>(02:57) – Falling pass rates and rising costs</p><p>(04:47) – Why the exam doesn't reflect legal practice</p><p>(06:45) – Who designed the SQE and why?</p><p>(07:13) – How the SRA ignored widespread criticism</p><p>(08:53) – The SQE has failed diversity</p><p>(11:26) – The false hope around qualifying work experience</p><p>(13:56) – Elitism and the reality of legal recruitment</p><p>(14:38) – One thing the SQE got right</p><p>(16:31) – Exam failures, IT issues and procedural problems</p><p>(17:07) – Why the SRA needs greater oversight</p><p>(17:54) – Lessons from the Axiom Ince collapse</p><p>(18:32) – Why the current approach to legal education isn't working</p><p>(19:11) – The Kaplan contract controversy</p><p>(20:07) – How Kaplan became the exclusive provider</p><p>(20:56) – Why the SQE doesn't create better lawyers</p><p>(21:35) – Does the whole system need an overhaul?</p><p><br /></p><p>New episodes every Tuesday.</p><p>Subscribe so you don't miss out. </p><p><br /></p><p>Follow James: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamrichardson/" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamrichardson/</a></p><p>Law Student Academy: <a href="https://www.lawstudent.academy/" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">https://www.lawstudent.academy/</a> </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Lawyer Unleashed</p><p>Join 10,000+ lawyers behind the mic:<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7429575878885564419/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer"> https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7429575878885564419/?displayConfirmation=true</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Website: <a href="https://lawyer-unleashed.com/mailinglist" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">https://lawyer-unleashed.com/mailinglist</a></p><p><br /></p><p>LU on LinkedIn:<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/lawyer-unleashed-podcast/" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer"> https://www.linkedin.com/company/lawyer-unleashed-podcast/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Helen Pamely on LinkedIn:<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenpamely/" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer"> https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenpamely/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Helen Pamely on Instagram:<a href="https://www.instagram.com/helenpamely/" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer"> https://www.instagram.com/helenpamely/</a></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>A note on accuracy in this episode: figures on Kaplan's revenue from the SQE contract are our own estimate based on current public candidate numbers and fees, not a confirmed company figure. On the SRA's original SQE consultation, a clear majority of respondents who took a position were opposed, rising to over 80% among academic respondents specif