Epstein Files Flopped, Nolan’s Mom Twerked, and Hyde-Smith Still Has No Record to Run On (Ep #1313)

**Podcast Description:**

Clay opens the show solo and immediately takes a caller who’s done with the Epstein files circus. The caller wants a full FAFO treatment for Trump after the underwhelming release—no readable details, no arrests, and the whole thing written off as a hoax. Clay’s response is blunt: he beat the drum for years, but these files were never coming in any form that satisfied anyone, same as the Kennedy files, MLK files, or the real UFO stuff. He refuses to call Trump a pedophile, argues the Democrats would have used anything real against him with the full force of the federal government, and says the previous administration didn’t even acknowledge the files existed until it became useful for tearing MAGA apart. He’s still happier overall than four years ago on the border and manufacturing, but he’s burned out on the politics of it and not interested in pretending one vote or one radio show changes the “same bird, different wings” reality.

From there the conversation shifts to Christine Wells Wansley (Nolan Wells’ mother) and a video of her twerking in the kitchen on her son’s birthday. Clay has zero patience for the “people mourn differently” defense. He calls the performance what it looks like—hood-rat theater from someone who reached out to Ben Crump before the body was even found and has spent the aftermath chasing the influencer and justice-for-Nolan spotlight. He stands by every earlier criticism of her and notes the predictable attempts to cancel him for saying it out loud.

Later he turns to the Mississippi Senate race. Obama cut an ad for Scott Colom. Clay uses it to hammer Cindy Hyde-Smith’s campaign for running almost entirely on “the other guy is worse” without ever clearly selling what she’s actually delivered for the state. Callers are frustrated—some cite her past role in agriculture contracts and weather-modification talk—but none are willing to vote for the Democrat. Clay’s position is consistent: he’s not on the fence about voting Republican, he just wants politicians who can articulate more than fear of the alternative. He also pushes back on the broader “we’re all illegal immigrants” framing of American history, arguing the country was built by conquest over tribal warfare, not theft of an existing nation-state, and that Americans get to decide who comes in now.

He closes by defending the idea of public executions (sparked by an image of a firing squad). The point, in his view, is deterrence—showing the actual final conse