The #1 audience climate communicators aren’t speaking to, with Dana R. Fisher

Climate communicators are quite frankly, terrible at talking to each other. Or that’s what new research just published by the Talking Climate Collaborative shows. Climate Curious invited the study’s lead researcher, sociologist and professor Dana R. Fisher to jump on the podcast during New York Climate Week to break down the results, and chat all things communication, democracy, and climate. In conversation with Climate Curious’ co-host Ben Hurst, this Apocalyptic Optimist shares how climate communicators can link arms and momentum share, why she thinks VIP climate shocks are a good thing (but can still feel sorry for Nicolas Cage), her theory on the Luigi Mangione case, and her climate clapback to the age-old (and incorrect!) “it only takes 3.5% to change the world” rule.

Learn more about the Talking Climate Collaborative: https://talkingclimate.com/

Read the new research on climate communication: https://talkingclimate.com/landscape-assessment/

Check out Dana’s work: https://danarfisher.com/

Listen to Dana’s podcast, Apocalyptic Optimist: https://open.spotify.com/show/12FU52C6c9kIZWEk1nOyPK

Join the Climate Curious conversation on socials:

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/climatecuriouspod/

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@climatecuriouspod

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtF6xzNkVIczlDmVcH8FCMA

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/10996041/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TEDxLondon

Website: https://tedxlondon.com/podcast/