Emily Adlam & David Wallace: The Quantum Interpretation That Divides Physicists

SPONSORS:

- Go to https://www.plaud.ai/curt and use the promo code "CURT" to get a Plaud device today

- I personally subscribe to The Economist. TOE listeners get 35% off the annual subscription. No other podcast has this! https://economist.com/TOE

This is a podcast all about parallel universes, and whether we have any right to believe in them. David Wallace, professor of philosophy of science at the University of Pittsburgh and a leading defender of the Many Worlds Interpretation, joins Professor Emily Adlam, his former student, for a rare joint conversation. The central fault line: Adlam argues no one living inside a many-worlds universe could ever rationally confirm the theory describing it, since Everettian probability may undermine the evidence used to support quantum mechanics itself. Wallace disagrees, but takes the challenge seriously. From there they range across the nature of the wave function, relational quantum mechanics, QBism, and scientific intersubjectivity — two sharp, collegial minds disagreeing productively about what kind of universe we actually live in.

TIMESTAMPS:

- 00:00:00 - Wave Function Ontology

- 00:05:35 - Everettian Probability Problem

- 00:11:45 - Relational Quantum Mechanics Limits

- 00:19:15 - Quantum Gravity Frameworks

- 00:24:50 - Subsystem Decomposition Approximations

- 00:31:10 - Testing Wavefunction Collapse

- 00:38:35 - Scientific Intersubjectivity Crisis