The Meaningful Money Personal Finance Podcast

← The Meaningful Money Personal Finance Podcast9 Sept · 35 min

QA60 - Listener Questions, Episode 60

QA60 - Listener Questions, Episode 609 Sept35 min

In this Meaningful Money Q&A episode, Pete Matthew and Roger Weeks answer listener questions on UK pensions, retirement planning and tax-efficient investing. They discuss the upcoming inheritance tax changes for pension pots, whether deferring the State Pension can help with care-fee planning, and how Nest pension contributions and charges really work. The episode also covers partial transfers from workplace pensions to SIPPs, managing commission income around higher-rate tax, and building a cash flow ladder for retirement abroad in Spain.

Shownotes: https://meaningfulmoney.tv/QA60

01:51  Question 1

Thank you for a great podcast. I have been listening to your podcasts diligently since 2014. Even then I made sure to catch up and since then it's been my weekly listen wherever I am. It's so great and I have been a great advocate. The simple rules of saving putting enough money aside thinking about your future and ensuring bad times are fundamental truths that should be taught at school. Don't get me started on the power of compounding. Well done and keep going.

I wanted to discuss the previous episode about what Roger said about the recent changes in pensions due soon and which Pete alluded to. This is regarding the new taxation that the government is introducing on remaining pension pot. It was argued that it is fair to tax the remaining pot as was the case before.

Before the pension reform, pensions would be DB style pensions and either the government or the employer would pay the pension. In such a case you can argue that whatever is left should be taxed as the pot is expected to be fair across those who live longer and those who died earlier. But they were guaranteed a pension.

However when pension freedom arrived the state washed their hands in providing a pension to people and it was up to the individual to secure its own pensions. Rightly so the state gave tax incentives to encourage people to save for their pension. As the state has outsourced the pension provision to the individual not taxing the remaining pot is fair. But now the state want to tax what remains in the pot.

I think it's not fair for the state not to provide a decent pension, ask individual to cater for their own and then tax what remains. Despite pension reform, studies have shown that people are under saving for their pension. We have an under saving crisis in the UK and taxing the pension pot will further aggravate that situation.  I don't think it's fair for governme